Next.js frontends engineered for what comes after launch

React, Next.js and TypeScript are our main frontend stack. We can work with other frontend environments when needed, but we usually recommend React/Next.js for SaaS products, portals, dashboards and SEO-sensitive product surfaces where maintainability and performance matter.

Yes. We build dashboards, client portals, admin panels and internal tools with role-based access, complex tables, forms, reporting views, charts, filters and backend/API integration.

Yes. We can improve Core Web Vitals, bundle size, rendering strategy, image handling, caching, data fetching and expensive component render paths. We measure before changing architecture, so optimisation work is tied to real bottlenecks.

Yes. We integrate frontends with REST, GraphQL, WebSocket or custom APIs. We can also help clarify API contracts when the frontend and backend are not aligned.

Yes. We can build multilingual frontend structures with locale-based routing, translated content models, hreflang, metadata and CMS workflows. This is especially useful for DACH/EU websites, portals and content-heavy platforms.

Yes. We can refactor or rebuild frontend layers gradually: component structure, routing, state management, data fetching, performance and design-system consistency. A full rewrite is not always necessary.

Next.js (default for SaaS, portals and SEO-sensitive products), Astro for content sites, React Native only when offline support or push notifications justify it. Vue, Svelte and Angular: consultative review only, not implementation — we're React-first and won't pretend otherwise.

Yes. Figma-to-code workflow, Storybook component documentation, design tokens implemented from your design system. We expect a working component spec; we don't replace the design team.

Common engagement. Strangler-pattern migration: new pages ship on the modern stack (Next.js + functional components) while the old codebase keeps running. Class components convert to hooks page-by-page. See the Frontend modernization section above for typical migration paths.

We work from your Figma. Design tokens, components and flows live in your design system; we implement them into Next.js / React with Storybook for component documentation. We don't replace the design team — we expect a working component spec, and we collaborate on edge cases, micro-interactions and accessibility decisions where the spec doesn't reach yet.

Yes — this is a common path. We build the new frontend against the existing backend API contract, often improving the contract incrementally (OpenAPI schema, error model, pagination) alongside the rebuild. The backend stays in production while the new frontend ships page-by-page or area-by-area, and the old frontend is decommissioned once parity is reached.

Often yes. The first step is measurement — Web Vitals from real user monitoring, bundle analysis, render-path review, image and asset audit. Many CWV issues are solvable with targeted fixes (lazy loading, code splitting, image strategy, caching, render-path cleanup) rather than a rebuild. We commit to a realistic expected delta after the audit, not before.

We're a senior product engineering team, not staffing. We design the frontend architecture (component model, state strategy, data fetching, routing, performance budget) and ship it as a coherent system. A solo frontend developer is a hire — they execute features within the architecture someone else owns. We're the right fit when the architecture itself needs senior thinking; we're the wrong fit when you just need a pair of hands for a defined backlog.