07 Feb 2025
Not benchmarks. Not hype. Actual decisions teams have to make.
At some point, every growing startup hits the same wall:
"Our analytics is slow, expensive, or both."
GA4 isn't enough anymore. Dashboards lag. Queries feel constrained. Product questions take hours — or days — to answer.
That's when ClickHouse and BigQuery enter the conversation.
This article doesn't compare features on paper. It explains when each system actually works in real startup environments — and when it becomes the wrong choice.
The wrong question:
"Is ClickHouse better than BigQuery?"
The right question:
"What kind of analytics system are we actually building?"
Because ClickHouse and BigQuery solve different problems, even though both are columnar analytics databases.
BigQuery is optimized for:
It shines when:
1. Zero Ops
No servers to manage. No tuning to start. This matters for small teams.
2. Elastic Scale
Huge datasets? No problem. You pay for what you scan.
3. Great for Marketing & BI
Attribution analysis, cohort reports, finance dashboards.
4. Fast Time-to-Value
You can answer big questions quickly — at first.
BigQuery pain usually appears later.
Query-based pricing means:
Founders start asking:
"Why did analytics cost spike this month?"
That's a bad question to answer retroactively.
BigQuery is not designed for:
You can build this — but you fight the system.
BigQuery is fast for big scans.
It's not fast for:
Product teams feel this immediately.
ClickHouse is optimized for:
It shines when:
1. Blazing Fast Queries
Milliseconds, not seconds. This changes how teams use data.
2. Predictable Cost
Infrastructure-based pricing. No surprise bills per query.
3. Perfect for Product Analytics
Funnels, retention, cohorts, sequences.
4. Great for Event-Heavy Systems
ClickHouse loves append-only event streams.
ClickHouse is not magic.
You must care about:
Without data engineering discipline, ClickHouse becomes painful.
ClickHouse rewards:
If your analytics is mostly:
BigQuery is more forgiving.
Here's a brutally honest comparison.
BigQuery Is a Better Fit If:
ClickHouse Is a Better Fit If:
Two failure patterns we see often:
Teams start with BigQuery (easy), then:
Migration becomes inevitable — but harder.
Teams adopt ClickHouse without:
They blame the tool for what is actually missing architecture.
In practice, many successful teams end up with both.
A common pattern:
Shared via:
This is not overengineering. It's specialization.
BigQuery:
ClickHouse:
Founders usually prefer:
predictable costs over cheap surprises.
Tooling influences behavior.
BigQuery encourages:
ClickHouse encourages:
Neither is "better".
They lead to different decisions.
At H-Studio, we don't start with:
"Should we use ClickHouse or BigQuery?"
We start with:
Then the choice becomes obvious.
BigQuery and ClickHouse are both excellent.
They fail when used for the wrong job.
Choose based on:
Not on hype.
If your analytics is slow, expensive, or both, the problem may be choosing the wrong system for your use case. We analyze your event model, query patterns, cost structure, and decision velocity—and recommend the right analytics architecture.
We build data engineering and analytics pipelines that give you the right system for each job: BigQuery for marketing and BI, ClickHouse for product analytics, or both when specialization makes sense. For growth analytics and BI dashboards, we create dashboards that founders can actually act on. For privacy-first tracking, we implement server-side analytics that comply with GDPR while preserving insight quality.
Enter your email to receive our latest newsletter.
Don't worry, we don't spam
Anna Hartung
Anna Hartung
Anna Hartung
And why most startups are flying blind without realizing it. GA4 answers marketing questions—not product questions. Learn why using it as a product decision engine leads to false confidence, slow learning, and expensive mistakes.
Or you'll keep making confident—and wrong—decisions. Most startups mix product analytics and marketing analytics, which answer fundamentally different questions. Learn why this breaks decision-making and how to separate them properly.
The silent leaks that don't show up in dashboards—but kill growth. Most startups don't lose money because of bad ideas. They lose money because decisions are based on incomplete data, teams optimize the wrong things, and success is measured too late—or incorrectly.
GDPR reality without killing insight, speed, or growth. In 2025, privacy-first analytics is not only possible—it's often better than legacy setups. Learn what actually works in Europe, what breaks, and how serious teams get insight without legal risk.
Almost every startup considers a rewrite at some point. But rewrites kill more startups than bad ideas ever do—slowly, quietly, and expensively. Learn why rewrites feel inevitable but aren't, and what actually works instead.
In 2025, building an impressive AI demo is easy. Keeping it alive in a real product is not. Most AI startups don't fail because their models are bad—they fail because the demo works and nothing beyond it does.
Explore our case studies demonstrating these technologies and approaches in real projects

Enterprise Data Analytics Platform — Comprehensive data processing and analytics solution for Russia's largest bank.
Learn more →
Revolutionizing textile industry with IoT sensors and data analytics.
Learn more →
Discover the City Behind Closed Doors — A curated mobile guide to Berlin's underground culture, built for locals, not tourists.
Learn more →